![]() |
|
SETUP | CCD SOFTWARE | READING |
|
Capturing a Comet Please note that I make certain references to
astrophotography equipment and software that are |
C/2001 Q4 Neat Click to View Image |
|
STEP #1 - Equipment Setup:
To acquire the data for this image I used a Takahashi FSQ-106N, ST10XME and CFW8A filter wheel with SBIG LRGB filters all controlled by a RoboFocus focusing system. The mount used was an Astro-Physics AP900GTO (circa 1998) with upgraded Rev D firmware. The following software was used to control the above equipment:
Before attempting to capturing a comet I would suggest the following checklist of tasks as all image acquisition will be taken unguided and requires special care to equipment setup:
Step #2 - Find the Comet:
The next step is to get your imaging system in position and focus to acquire the data for the comet. This consist of a few easy steps:
Now we are ready to move to the next step of programming our mount to track the comet.
Step #3 - Program you Mount:
This is probably the most challenging part of the acquisition process and most time consuming. A mount tracks objects in the sky by moving at sidereal rate counter acting the rotation of the earth. Deep sky objects don't change position over time (well not over one night of imaging anyways). Comet's are unlike deep sky targets as they are moving through the sky at a different rate than sidereal. Imagine trying to image a meteor as it hurls across the night sky but in slow motion. So the next crucial step is programming (or directing) the mount to move at a speed other than sidereal. Fortunately comets move very slowly from our earthly perspective, so this is something that can be accomplished with amateur mounts. PulseGuide by Ray Gralak working with an Astro-Physics mount makes this task possible. The concept is as the mount is moving at its normal sidereal rate, PulseGuide sends carefully timed 'pulses' to the mount to speed up or slow down the RA and DEC speed of the motors. This allows you, for example, to slow down RA by .02 arc-seconds per second and speed up DEC by .06 arc-seconds per second. If you know the RA and DEC speeds of the comet you are attempting to image, you can program PulseGuide to get your mount to track perfectly on the comet. I offer this step-by-step tutorial on how to accomplish this feat. Please note, it is advised that you read the PulseGuide manual first to gain a better understanding of the following steps:
Obviously the above procedures are specific to PulseGuide and an Astro-Physics mount. I am sure that the same RA and DEC adjustments can be made on other select mounts with other procedures. There is another way to solve the problem of tracking a comet that might seem much easier that I would not discount: An external guide scope and camera guiding on the comets nucleus. If you have a STV (or other guiding camera) and a guide scope, you should be able to point the guide scope at the comet and auto-guide satisfactory. Just make sure not to calibrate on the comet as it is moving and will provide inaccurate mount movement information. Use a star in the same field of view to calibrate your guider.
Step #4 - Planning your Sequence:
Now that we have are mount tracking on the comet, the background stars are moving and the comet is staying put. This will allow us to get some very crisp shots of the comet's structure. But the very fact that the stars are now moving relative to the comets means that long exposure photographs are going to have lots of streaks in the background (or foreground) of the image. This step combined with careful calibration and image processing will allow us to get the best of both worlds, a perfect picture of the comet without stars and a wonderful star background. For the sake of understanding, I am going to jump ahead and show the end result of what we are looking for from our acquisition sequence:
The above image represents 10 luminance images taken for Comet C/2004 Q2 (Machholz). The 10 images have been mean combined to show their respective star locations. As you can see, the comet stays in the same place, but the stars move in a north east direction. If I were display the same 10 images for the red, green and blue channels, they would like very much like the luminance image above. The key to the above image is that there are no stars that are overlapping one another. Carefully planned exposures have givin the mount enough time to move between exposures to allow for no stars to overlap for the entire image set. Compare this to a single long exposure of the comet. Notice the familiar streaks?
Fortunately, with the first set of images, we will be able to use a special combine technique to remove the stars completely from the image. The second image however, has no hope of removing the trailing stars. More on that later. Setting up your imaging acquisition sequence takes careful planning based on a several factors: Your imaging systems image scale, the speed at which the comet is moving and the objects that are going to enter and exit the field of view. For the following example, I will plan for an acquisition sequence using my Takahashi FSQ-106N refractor and SBIG ST10XME camera. The main goal is to space out our exposures so that we do not end up with any overlapping stars in any of our master luminance, red, green or blue channels. The best way to spread out the amount of time between exposures and channels is by using a combination of sequencing and delays. Take this sequence as an example:
Lets assume it takes 5 seconds to download the image and 3 seconds to change filters adding 8 seconds to each exposure. This would yield a total running time of the above sequence of 432 seconds (108 seconds per exposure + delay * 4). By repeating this sequence 10 or more times, we ensure that each integration for each channel is 438 seconds apart from one another. The question is, is this enough time to avoid star overlap? In my case, I shot the above comet on Dec 23, 2004 when it's RA and DEC rate was -0.0240, 0.0649 respectively. My imaging system yielded an image scale of 5.3 arc-seconds per pixel at 2x2 bin mode. The brightest object in the field was HIP 19508 at a magnitude of 7.36 (seen on the far right in the above images). The reason 40 seconds was chosen as the exposure time was because of blooming limits on my ST10XME. So lets assume that this is a constant. The factor we need to calculate is the delay between exposures. The following steps will assist you in coming up with the proper delay between exposures:
You can see that our original estimate of 60 seconds was not long enough to completely avoid star overlap. (BTW, this was the case with the recent image I took of C/2004 Q2 and I ended up with less than desirable results. Now that I know the math, I can avoid this next time). Its is important to understand that a comet's RA and DEC rate changes over time. For instance, on Jan 25, 2005, C/2004 Q2 will have a RA rate of -0.0144 and a DEC rate of 0.0546, Much slower than on Dec 23, 2004. Make sure to check the rate of your comet every night you attempt to image it and adjust your delay times accordingly. There is nothing like a real world test to check our assumptions, so the next step is to take the proposed sequence three times to confirm we are avoiding overlap. In my case, I use CCDAutoPilot for image acquisition sequences. The following is an example of how I would set up the test sequence:
After running your test sequence, load the three clear exposures into your image processing software. Do an average combine with all three integrations and confirm that the stars are spaced appropriately as in Figure 1 pictured above. One last note, you may need to align the three images on the comet's nucleus before you do your average combine to see exactly how the stars line up. We will be aligning on the comet in our calibration stage, so its a good idea to check it now. More on that later...
Step #5 - Acquiring the Data: Congratulations! You have passed all the difficult steps. Its on to acquisition and image processing. First off, lets discuss some reasons for my exposure and binning reasoning. I have chosen to image comets with my ST10XME and FSQ-106N because of its wide field of view (comets are big), its fast focal ratio and camera sensitivity. I will soon attempt to image C/2004 Q2 with my STL11000. I suspect that I will bin the camera 3x3 for added sensitivity and shorter exposure times. But why the binning and short exposures? I choose to keep my exposures short to avoid blooming and to create a large stack of exposures in which to combine. I will be using one of several different combine types that will all benefit from lots of sub-exposures. The reason for binning is to increase the sensitivity of the camera, once again for several reasons; overcome the read-noise of the camera, bring out more color from the dim comet and increase my image scale to make unguided imaging more reliable. You can experiment with your imaging set-up to find the best combination of exposure length and binning modes. Now, on to acquiring our data. We are going to do three separate imaging runs to capture the required data for processing. I call this the 'comet-stars-comet' sequence. Its fairly simple at this point assuming we are all set-up with our tracking and timing. The sequence goes like this:
Lets look at each segment of the above sequence to understand what we are trying to accomplish.
The concept is to capture the comet for the first half of our imaging session, stop tracking the comet, take exposures of the starfield, and then capture the comet for the second half of our imaging session. Why not take the star field first, then 10 comet exposures? This is personal integrity at play here. I feel that for the shot to be considered accurate, one should take the star-field in the middle of the total imaging session to preserve some sense of reality. The fact is, with the following image processing techniques you could place the comet on top of any star field you wish. I leave the choice up to you, but urge you to follow my technique for the sake of scientific integrity. BTW - The official time of the image would be clocked at when you took the star field exposures. Make sure to check ahead with TheSky6 to ensure you don't have a Magnitude 3 star entering the field of view during your imaging session as this will surely bloom your camera and exceed our calculated star diameter threshold. I also encourage you to take more than 10 total comet
exposures if possible as the more exposures you have, the better
your signal to noise ratio and the more subtle detail you will
bring out in the comet's tail.
Step #6 - Calibrating,
Aligning and Combining the Data:
This step assumes that you have a basic understanding of calibration and alignment techniques for CCD imaging. So I present a simple checklist of items we will need to calibrate our image sets.
We have four channels we need to process, Clear, Red, Green and Blue. I will use the data we acquired for the clear channel for my walkthrough.
Now that we have all of our light frames calibrated and aligned, its time to combine them to make the master luminance frame. Depending on what software you use, there are different methods that will produce the best results. I offer the following examples below: Mira Pro 7
Maxim DL 4.0
Sigma by Ray Gralak:
If everything goes well, you should end up with an image of the comet completely devoid of any stars while retaining a high signal to noise ratio. Your image should look something like this:
Other image processing programs will have similar combine methods which I urge you to experiment with. Now repeat the entire process for the remaining red, green and blue channels to create your four master light frames. Step #7 - Creating our Luminance, RGB and Starfield images: We will now create three images which we will import into Photoshop for final image processing. A luminance channel, a RGB color channel, and a star field channel. At this point we should have four master light frames. I will refer to them as neat.clear.fit, neat.red.fit, neat.green.fit and neat.blue.fit. We should also have ready one set of our clear, red, green and blue star field images which we aquired at sidereal rate in the middle of our acquisition run. If you recall, we called this Segment 2. In the following examples, I will use Maxim DL 4.0 to process our raw data into our three master channels for import into Photoshop. Master Luminance Channel: I find comets difficult to stretch manually in programs such as Photoshop as there is much dynamic range to bring out. The bright nucleus, the faint tail, or in most cases multiple tails of different intensities. If you are feel comfortable stretching the images manually than I urge you to give it a try as you will always have greater control. I find the DDP stretching works quite well with comets and therefore, this is my preferred method of making histogram adjustments to the raw, combine data. I present the following method for DDP stretching the clear data to create our Luminance channel.
The resulting image should look something like this:
Save this image as a 16 bit TIFF file called neat.lum.tif. We will use this later in Photoshop. Congratulations, we have just created our master luminance channel! RGB Color Channel The next step is to create our RGB Color Channel.
Now that we have our raw LRGB color channel, we will repeat the process of DDP stretching the image to produce the following results:
You can now start to see some of the wonderful detail of the comet's nucleus and tails consisting of wonderful green, blue and subtle red shades. Save this image as a 16 bit TIFF file called neat.rgb.tif. We will use this later in Photoshop. Now on to the star field. Star Field Channel Creating the star field channel is straight forward.
You should end up with the following result. The comet is very faint compared to the above images, but the stars are well pronounced and will be slightly sharpened later in Photoshop.
Save this image as a 16 bit TIFF file called neat.stars.tif. We have now created all of our channels for processing in Photoshop. On to the next step. Step #8 - Image Processing in Photoshop: Now we come to the fun part! Importing our images into Photoshop, creating our layers, and making our final adjustments. The finish line is well in sight.
At this point, its all about making fine tune adjustments to your image until you are pleased with the results. I personally do not like to alter the original data that I imported into Photoshop, so I use Adjustment Layers to make adjustments. They are very handy because the changes you make are not permanent allowing you to go back and change settings without having to use the undo or history pallete. Here is what the my final Layers dialog box ends up looking like when I have completed my processing:
It took quite a bit of planning and patience to capture this comet, but the results are quite rewarding. Here is the final image after image processing in Photoshop:
Conclusion: I hope you have found my tutorial useful and it inspires you to capture a comet! I really enjoy the challenge of imaging comets and always look forward to the arrival of a new ice ball. If you have any questions regarding any of these techniques, or have techniques of your own, I would love to hear from you. I can be reached at rbennion@ewellobservatory.com. Happy Comet Hunting! |
|
|